We will be back next week!
BLOGGERS: MARK SCHOLZ, MD & RALPH H. BLUM
The co-authors of Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers, blog alternate posts weekly. We invite you to post your comments.
Tuesday, December 31, 2013
Tuesday, December 24, 2013
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year!
We're taking the holidays to gear up for 2014. We'll be back on 7 January. Here is a recap of the 2013 year in review - new social media launches.
THE PROSTATE VANGUARD An email list for those interested in Active Surveillance and Imaging. Learn more about it from Dr. Scholz http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c8lZPyOv04 and you may subscribe here: http://www.prostateoncology.com/contact/subscribe
KEEP MY PROSTATE Stay tuned for a new web site launch in 2014
http://www.keepmyprostate.com/
GOOGLE+ DR. SCHOLZ and PROSTATE ONCOLOGY Keep up on local events and news
google.com/+Prostateoncology
GOOGLE+ HANGOUTS with Prostate Cancer Live discussing The Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer https://plus.google.com/#s/%23hangoutsonair
Wishing you and your loved ones a wonderful holiday season.
THE PROSTATE VANGUARD An email list for those interested in Active Surveillance and Imaging. Learn more about it from Dr. Scholz http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3c8lZPyOv04 and you may subscribe here: http://www.prostateoncology.com/contact/subscribe
KEEP MY PROSTATE Stay tuned for a new web site launch in 2014
http://www.keepmyprostate.com/
GOOGLE+ DR. SCHOLZ and PROSTATE ONCOLOGY Keep up on local events and news
google.com/+Prostateoncology
GOOGLE+ HANGOUTS with Prostate Cancer Live discussing The Overtreatment of Prostate Cancer https://plus.google.com/#s/%23hangoutsonair
CLINICAL TRIALS Current trials open for recruitment at Prostate Oncology Specialists
Tuesday, December 17, 2013
PSA Screening for Prostate Cancer
BY MARK SCHOLZ, MD
Most elderly men already have prostate cancer—they just don’t know they have it. And they might be better off remaining ignorant. Newly-diagnosed men are thrown into an eight-billion-per-year medical world that extols radical treatment. Over-treatment is so out-of-control that a New England Journal of Medicine study estimates that forty-eight men are getting unnecessary surgery or radiation for each individual who truly benefits from them.
Random Biopsy, Not PSA is the Real Problem
When PSA is elevated, primary care physicians usually refer to a urologist for an immediate 12-core random prostate biopsy. One million men are biopsied annually in the United States. Few people realize that even when the PSA is normal, the biopsy will be positive 20% of the time. The problem is that a diagnosis of any prostate cancer, even the Low-Risk type, almost invariably leads to surgery or radiation.
Biopsies Are Not Benign
Over-diagnosing Low-Risk prostate cancer, and the attendant risk of over-treatment, is not the only problem caused by random biopsy. Consider the emotional devastation caused by a cancer diagnosis. Men are literally frightened to death by the discovery of prostate cancer: The first week after diagnosis, the risk of suicide and heart attacks jumps dramatically. In addition, 3% of men suffer biopsy-induced infections resulting in hospitalization. Fatal infections are estimated to occur in approximately one-thousand men undergoing random biopsy per year.
Stop PSA Screening?
Due to all these mounting negatives, the US Preventative Services Task Force now recommends that routine PSA testing cease altogether. The Task Force’s conclusion was that unnecessary treatment to over a hundred thousand men annually is too big a price to pay even though PSA screening saves lives. The Task Force fails to understand that overtreatment isn’t caused by PSA, it’s what physicians do with the information PSA provides—they automatically refer every patient for immediate random biopsy.
PSA Is Heavily Influenced by Prostate Size
Most PSA originates from the prostate gland, not from cancer. Therefore, when the cancer is relatively small, PSA is a reflection prostate gland size. In a man without cancer, PSA normally averages one-tenth of the prostate volume. For example, the average PSA for a 30cc prostate is 3; five for a 50cc prostate and 10 for a 100cc prostate with size determined by ultrasound or MRI.
Therefore, PSA can only be termed “abnormal” if it’s 50% higher than expected, based on a man’s prostate size. For example, an abnormal PSA for a 30cc prostate is 4.5, a 50cc prostate, 7.5 and a 100cc prostate, 15. Additional extraneous factors such as low-grade infections, lab variations and recent sexual activity can also cause PSA to vary. Repeat testing helps average out these variations so the “real” PSA can be determined.
Primary Care Doctors Are the Source for Balanced Counsel
Only the primary care physicians can stop the mindless rush to random biopsy. Instead of referring for random biopsy they can send their patients with elevated PSA for prostate imaging with multiparametric MRI or Color Doppler Ultrasound. Imaging can put the PSA elevation into context by determining the prostate size. Also, in the hands of an experienced radiologist, using state-of-the-art, three-Tesla MRI, high-grade cancer can be ruled out with 95 to 98% accuracy.
If imaging detects a high-grade lesion, primary physicians can then counsel their patients about whether a targeted biopsy directed at the abnormal lesion should be performed. Alternatively they can recommend simple monitoring with a repeat imaging study six to twelve months down the road to determine if the lesion is growing. Lastly, if a targeted biopsy shows cancer, rather than being guided by a urologist, who is, after all, a surgeon, patients can obtain counsel from their primary physician, a non-surgeon who can provide unbiased assistance in selecting the best treatment.
Estimating Cancer Risk
If men are concerned about the risk of forgoing an immediate random biopsy they can estimate the percentage likelihood of harboring low-grade or high-grade disease with an online calculator by googling, “risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer.”
Imaging Rather than Biopsy
Prior to PSA screening men should be informed that if PSA is high, the first step should be imaging rather than random biopsy. Random biopsy can cause serious infections. It also diagnoses Low-Risk prostate cancer, a harmless condition that nevertheless, often leads to unnecessary treatment. PSA screening, while saving lives by detecting High-Risk cancer at an early stage, can also, if handled improperly, lead to unnecessary treatment with many lifelong side effects.
Most elderly men already have prostate cancer—they just don’t know they have it. And they might be better off remaining ignorant. Newly-diagnosed men are thrown into an eight-billion-per-year medical world that extols radical treatment. Over-treatment is so out-of-control that a New England Journal of Medicine study estimates that forty-eight men are getting unnecessary surgery or radiation for each individual who truly benefits from them.
Random Biopsy, Not PSA is the Real Problem
When PSA is elevated, primary care physicians usually refer to a urologist for an immediate 12-core random prostate biopsy. One million men are biopsied annually in the United States. Few people realize that even when the PSA is normal, the biopsy will be positive 20% of the time. The problem is that a diagnosis of any prostate cancer, even the Low-Risk type, almost invariably leads to surgery or radiation.
Biopsies Are Not Benign
Over-diagnosing Low-Risk prostate cancer, and the attendant risk of over-treatment, is not the only problem caused by random biopsy. Consider the emotional devastation caused by a cancer diagnosis. Men are literally frightened to death by the discovery of prostate cancer: The first week after diagnosis, the risk of suicide and heart attacks jumps dramatically. In addition, 3% of men suffer biopsy-induced infections resulting in hospitalization. Fatal infections are estimated to occur in approximately one-thousand men undergoing random biopsy per year.
Stop PSA Screening?
Due to all these mounting negatives, the US Preventative Services Task Force now recommends that routine PSA testing cease altogether. The Task Force’s conclusion was that unnecessary treatment to over a hundred thousand men annually is too big a price to pay even though PSA screening saves lives. The Task Force fails to understand that overtreatment isn’t caused by PSA, it’s what physicians do with the information PSA provides—they automatically refer every patient for immediate random biopsy.
PSA Is Heavily Influenced by Prostate Size
Most PSA originates from the prostate gland, not from cancer. Therefore, when the cancer is relatively small, PSA is a reflection prostate gland size. In a man without cancer, PSA normally averages one-tenth of the prostate volume. For example, the average PSA for a 30cc prostate is 3; five for a 50cc prostate and 10 for a 100cc prostate with size determined by ultrasound or MRI.
Therefore, PSA can only be termed “abnormal” if it’s 50% higher than expected, based on a man’s prostate size. For example, an abnormal PSA for a 30cc prostate is 4.5, a 50cc prostate, 7.5 and a 100cc prostate, 15. Additional extraneous factors such as low-grade infections, lab variations and recent sexual activity can also cause PSA to vary. Repeat testing helps average out these variations so the “real” PSA can be determined.
Primary Care Doctors Are the Source for Balanced Counsel
Only the primary care physicians can stop the mindless rush to random biopsy. Instead of referring for random biopsy they can send their patients with elevated PSA for prostate imaging with multiparametric MRI or Color Doppler Ultrasound. Imaging can put the PSA elevation into context by determining the prostate size. Also, in the hands of an experienced radiologist, using state-of-the-art, three-Tesla MRI, high-grade cancer can be ruled out with 95 to 98% accuracy.
If imaging detects a high-grade lesion, primary physicians can then counsel their patients about whether a targeted biopsy directed at the abnormal lesion should be performed. Alternatively they can recommend simple monitoring with a repeat imaging study six to twelve months down the road to determine if the lesion is growing. Lastly, if a targeted biopsy shows cancer, rather than being guided by a urologist, who is, after all, a surgeon, patients can obtain counsel from their primary physician, a non-surgeon who can provide unbiased assistance in selecting the best treatment.
Estimating Cancer Risk
If men are concerned about the risk of forgoing an immediate random biopsy they can estimate the percentage likelihood of harboring low-grade or high-grade disease with an online calculator by googling, “risk of biopsy-detectable prostate cancer.”
Imaging Rather than Biopsy
Prior to PSA screening men should be informed that if PSA is high, the first step should be imaging rather than random biopsy. Random biopsy can cause serious infections. It also diagnoses Low-Risk prostate cancer, a harmless condition that nevertheless, often leads to unnecessary treatment. PSA screening, while saving lives by detecting High-Risk cancer at an early stage, can also, if handled improperly, lead to unnecessary treatment with many lifelong side effects.
Labels:
biopsy,
imaging,
low risk,
oncologist,
primary care doctors,
prostate cancer,
screening,
urologist,
US Preventative Services Task Force
Tuesday, December 10, 2013
Detoxing for Jocks
BY RALPH BLUM
Recently my friend Michael Crocker—who is 59, a serious athlete (He calls himself “an over-the-hill jock”) and, because of his family history, at risk for prostate cancer—decided that he was not paying half enough attention to the his diet. He was exercising and getting regular PSA evaluations, but he was eating as he always had, gaining weight and feeling that something in his diet was causing him bloating and discomfort. He decided he might be having an inflammation reaction from foods that, while not allergy based, created a food intolerance that might be irritating his gut, leaving him depressed—and adding undesirable calories/weight. He put himself on what the profession calls “a food restriction diet.”
Michael made a list of what he called possible “food triggers” and going one week at a time, began eliminating them from his diet—and watching for improvement like decline in acid reflux, better sleep, more energy.
Here is Michael’s list of foods removed from his detoxing diet. He began by subtracting soy, then moved on to wheat and dairy and shellfish, He severely limited his sugar intake, cut out artificial sweeteners entirely, allowing himself honey in small amounts.
After about eight weeks, Michael told me, “I’m eating lean and clean, and probably eating more vegetables and fruit than I ever have before in my life.”
He started reading labels, something he had never done before. (“Jocks don’t read labels. Or at least they didn’t use to.”) He discovered that the FDA had called for labeling of “food allergens” in any packaged food (most of his items) and that even if items like soy were not specifically branded, they must be labeled somewhere on the package.
By the end of three months, Michael was eating limited amounts of lean meats, concentrating more on vegetables and fruits, and adding a side order of brown rice or sweet potato when he craved carbs. He rarely felt hungry on this diet. He dealt with his craving for snacks by carrying a bag of “Trail Mix” in his briefcase.
A
typical day may look like this:
•
When you wake up: 1 glass green juice
Recently my friend Michael Crocker—who is 59, a serious athlete (He calls himself “an over-the-hill jock”) and, because of his family history, at risk for prostate cancer—decided that he was not paying half enough attention to the his diet. He was exercising and getting regular PSA evaluations, but he was eating as he always had, gaining weight and feeling that something in his diet was causing him bloating and discomfort. He decided he might be having an inflammation reaction from foods that, while not allergy based, created a food intolerance that might be irritating his gut, leaving him depressed—and adding undesirable calories/weight. He put himself on what the profession calls “a food restriction diet.”
Michael made a list of what he called possible “food triggers” and going one week at a time, began eliminating them from his diet—and watching for improvement like decline in acid reflux, better sleep, more energy.
Here is Michael’s list of foods removed from his detoxing diet. He began by subtracting soy, then moved on to wheat and dairy and shellfish, He severely limited his sugar intake, cut out artificial sweeteners entirely, allowing himself honey in small amounts.
After about eight weeks, Michael told me, “I’m eating lean and clean, and probably eating more vegetables and fruit than I ever have before in my life.”
He started reading labels, something he had never done before. (“Jocks don’t read labels. Or at least they didn’t use to.”) He discovered that the FDA had called for labeling of “food allergens” in any packaged food (most of his items) and that even if items like soy were not specifically branded, they must be labeled somewhere on the package.
By the end of three months, Michael was eating limited amounts of lean meats, concentrating more on vegetables and fruits, and adding a side order of brown rice or sweet potato when he craved carbs. He rarely felt hungry on this diet. He dealt with his craving for snacks by carrying a bag of “Trail Mix” in his briefcase.
Here
is a menu he found from Dr. Amy Shah on “RiseEarth”.
As Dr. Shah writes in mindbodygreen
•
Breakfast: Chocolate Cherry (Green) Smoothie: spinach,
raw cacao, frozen organic cherries, chia seeds, coconut milk
•
Snack: Herbal tea
•
Lunch: Large salad with avocado, olive oil,
balsamic dressing, and tomato soup
•
Dinner: 3 to 5 Black bean burgers (no bun) with
guacamole, and salsa. (Optional: sweet potatoes, veggies, and kale chips)
Michael
found that he was never hungry on this type of diet, and that while he wasn’t
sure exactly which of “the usual culprits” had been causing his discomfort, he
was happy to live with the results (including significant weight loss) of what
he calls “The Aging Jock’s Anti-Inflammatory Detox Diet.” Aka AJAIDD.
Tuesday, December 3, 2013
Another Milestone at Prostate Oncology, Father Joe Gets his First Apartment
BY MARK SCHOLZ, MD
Father Joe Johnson has been with Prostate OncologySpecialists since its inception. Twenty years ago, after he retired from parish
work, he started pursuing his lifelong interest in medicine and computers by
volunteering to do internet searches to help find new treatments for our cancer
patients. Doing an internet search does not sound like a big deal today, but
back in the early 1990s there was no Internet Explorer (or Netscape Navigator
for that matter). Getting online required substantial computer expertise and
information could only be accessed through medical libraries by payment of an
annual licensing fee. Father Joe was well equipped for his radical career
change out of parish work. He had previously spent a number of years as a
chemistry teacher at Loyola University.
A few years later, when searching the internet became a more
straight-forward proposition, Father Joe asked if he could help out in some
other capacity. Our practice had a large database of early-stage prostate
cancer patients who were treated with hormone therapy, but we lacked the
statistical skills to analyze the results. I knew of Father Joe’s lifelong
interest in mathematics, and wondered if he would consider tackling medical
statistics on our behalf.
For those of you who don’t know, qualified statisticians are
rarer than diamonds and far more expensive and difficult to come by. To make a
very long story brief, Father Joe subsequently mastered medical statistics and
has coauthored all the scientific publications at Prostate Oncology.
Throughout all the years of unsung service volunteering in
our office—which as you probably know, focuses exclusively on the treatment of
prostate cancer—Father Joe has been a constant and immovable rock of steadfast
optimism and hope, visiting with patients and keeping them company while the
doctors and nurses rush around trying to stay on schedule. Sure, after entering
an exam room and introducing himself as a Catholic Priest he has to
good-naturedly endure innumerable bad jokes about his being there to give last
rites. But almost invariably people quickly warm up to his friendly presence. I
strongly suspect that some of our long-term patients are only willing to suffer
the terrible Marina del Rey traffic because of the pleasure of visiting with
Father Joe.
Perhaps it’s reasonable to expect patients to put up with
the terrible traffic since they only have to endure it on a periodic basis. But
what about me? Back when I lived in Long Beach I used to suffer the traffic
daily. Being a problem solver by nature, I began considering the purchase of a
limousine. My plan was to black out all the passenger windows and don a cap
every morning so that I could pretend I was chauffeuring a passenger and drive
in the diamond lane. However, it was Father Joe who rescued me from my
law-breaking soul.
One evening, after a long day at the office while bemoaning
my own tiresome commute home, I discovered that Father Joe was on the lookout
for a new place to live. Once our mutual need was discovered it led to a quick
solution. Father Joe had lived in trailers off and on throughout his life. And
my home in Long Beach had a huge, unused backyard easily accessible through an
alley behind the property. After a quick search of the classified ads, we made
a phone call. That same evening we purchased Father Joe’s new home and had it
delivered to my back yard. For the next five years Father Joe’s calm and loving
presence helped me fight the good fight on the 405 freeway morning and evening.
The privilege of taking the diamond lane was definitely a
huge improvement. But in 2003 I got the opportunity to purchase a home ten
minutes from the office. The problem was that the backyard of the new house was
a hillside, with no place for a trailer. What about Father Joe? My initial
calls around the Marina were very discouraging: all I was encountered were
ten-year wait lists. But the problem was solved when we found out that a
relative of one of our patients owned the marina across the street from the
office. Father Joe has been living happily in a boat ever since. Clearly he has
friends in high places.
Father
Joe’s odyssey of volunteering at Prostate Oncology began twenty years ago when
he was a young man. But now at age 82, what the heck is he doing living on a
boat? Thank God he has not slipped on the wet dock or fallen into the water off
his rocking boat. Last night I showed him a new apartment located a mere
three-minute walk from the office but he ended up asking me to take him back to
sleep on his beloved boat. After a lifetime spent in the small spaces of boat
and trailers, to Father Joe, the one-bedroom apartment is gargantuan. I’ll take
another run at getting him to stay at the apartment tonight. If that doesn’t
succeed I may have to sink the boat.
Labels:
apartment,
Father Joe Johnson,
long beach,
Marina del Rey,
Mark Scholz,
statistics,
traffic
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)