BY RALPH BLUM
For
many men who have trouble achieving potency— keeping an erection firm enough
for sex—erection dysfunction (ED) medications--Viagra, Cialis, Levitra--work
well and cause few side effects.
Sildenfil (Viagra), vardenfil (Levitra), and tadalafil (Cialis) are all
medications that reverse ED by increasing nitric oxide, a chemical naturally
produced by the body that opens and relaxes the blood vessels in the penis.
While helping to get and keep an erection, these medications do not increase
sex drive, and only cause erections if you are sexually stimulated.
In an article in My Generation magazine, Hal Ackerman wrote that after
12 months of hormone-deprivation therapy, his libido was totally gone, an empty
balloon, with the result that women whose bodies in the past would have
stimulated longing and desire, generated no more response than the sight of
uncovered furniture. However Ackerman claims that “via the miracle of modern
pharmacology” he was able to perform sex with his new girlfriend for her pleasure—though
with little personal gratification.
Although they work in similar ways, each of the ED medications has a slightly
different chemical make-up. These minor differences affect the way each
medication works, such as how quickly it takes effect and wears off, as well as
the potential side effects.
Viagra and Levitra can be taken without food, no more than once a day, about
30-50 minutes before sex, and are effective up to 5 hours. Cialis can be taken
as a small daily dose, anytime, with or without food, and is effective anytime
between doses. The 36 hour Cialis can be taken with or without food, no more
than once a day, about 30 minutes before sex, and is effective for up to 36
hours.
Not all men can take these ED medications. They may not be safe if you have any
kind of heart problems, high or low blood pressure that is not controlled, a
history of stroke within the last six months, eye problems, severe liver
disease, or kidney disease. Always check with your doctor, and be sure he knows
any other drugs you are taking as ED medications can interact dangerously with
a number of other drugs—including alpha blockers, antibiotics, anti-seizure
drugs, blood thinners, and various heart medications. And a final caveat: as I
wrote in a previous blog, if you have had a prostatectomy, ED medications only
work if the nerves located close to the prostate have not been removed or
damaged.
Most men who take Viagra, Levitra or Cialis are not bothered by side effects,
but when they do occur they can include headache, flushing (Viagra and
Levitra), indigestion, stuffy or runny nose, back pain and muscle aches
(Cialis), temporary vision changes (Viagra and Levitra), and rarely, dizziness
or fainting. Also rarely, priapism (an erection that doesn’t go away) can occur
and requires medical treatment.
ED medications can be purchased over the Internet, but beware of scams. Check
to see if an online pharmacy is legitimate—never order drugs if the pharmacy
gives no phone number, if prices seem too good to be true, or if you are told
no prescription is necessary. Make sure you get the exact dose and type
prescribed by your doctor. And don’t be fooled into buying “herbal” or
non-prescription equivalents. They are not as effective, and some can contain
harmful substances. You may find yourself paying as much as $20 per dose. But
then some of us would consider the restoration of potency a bargain at twice
the price.
BLOGGERS: MARK SCHOLZ, MD & RALPH H. BLUM
The co-authors of Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers, blog alternate posts weekly. We invite you to post your comments.
Showing posts with label levitra. Show all posts
Showing posts with label levitra. Show all posts
Tuesday, June 11, 2013
Value of a Single erection
Labels:
cialis,
erection dysfunction,
Hal Ackerman,
hormone deprivation therapy,
levitra,
prostate cancer,
viagra
Tuesday, May 7, 2013
Surgery vs. Seeds vs. IMRT
BY
MARK SCHOLZ, MD
Many
men with Intermediate-Risk prostate cancer consider treatment with
radiation or surgery. Treatment selection is influenced by age and preexisting
status, especially as regards baseline sexual and urinary function. These days
“surgery” usually means robotic surgery rather than the older, “open”
procedure. Brachytherapy (radioactive seeds), and intensity modulated radiation
(IMRT) are the most widely used types of radiation.
Cure
Rates
All
treatment options result in similar cure rates assuming the best physicians and
technology are used. If any single treatment can be considered to have a slight
advantage, it is brachytherapy. Seed implants deliver a somewhat higher dose of
radiation, possibly with slightly better accuracy. All types of radiation have
a slight cure-rate advantage over surgery because radiation treats a small margin
around the gland. Surgery, especially when extra-capsular disease is
present, may leave cancer behind, an unfortuante situation called “a positive
margin.”
Quality
of Life
Since
cure rates are equivalent, the main criteria for selecting treatment are side
effects. Table 1 lists the risks faced by a 65-year-old with good erectile
function and without preexisting prostate problems. Risks are adjusted up or
down based on a man’s age and his sexual and urinary function prior to
treatment.
Table
1 Long Term Side Effects
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
*Climacturia
is the ejaculation of urine rather than sperm
**Stricture
is a urethral scar
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Short Term Side Effects
Some of the long-term effects noted in Table 1 also occur short term. All men are impotent after surgery though 50% eventually recover some functionality. Urinary symptoms, termed “urethritis,” occur in two-thirds of men who undergo brachytherapy, usually lasting a couple months. Proctitis symptoms lasting one to two months occur in about half of the men who are treated with IMRT.
Treatment for Long Term Side Effects
Shrinkage
and shortening of the penis due to surgery may be partially averted with early use
of Viagra, Cialis or Levitra, and when necessary, the injection of
prostaglandins. For treating impotence or incontinence, patient satisfaction is
about 85% with a surgically implanted penile prosthesis and 60% with a
surgically implanted artificial urinary sphincter. Chronic urethritis, a
non-healing radiation burn of the urinary passage, manifests as pain, frequent
urination, and a compelling urge to urinate right now. Proctitis side
effects can be described similarly, but affecting the rectum. Palliative
treatments for chronic urethritis and proctitis are only partially effective.
Further
Aspects of Surgery and Radiation
Surgery:
The
surgical skill of urologists varies and is measured by how frequently cancer is
left behind after the surgery, termed a positive margin. The best
surgeons average a 10% rate. Studies show that many urologists, even at
reputable centers, leave cancer behind up to 50% of the time. Prostate removal
gives information about the size and grade of the cancer, helping to improve the
accuracy of projections about future relapse. Surgery also simplifies PSA
monitoring, since unlike radiation, there is no residual prostate gland
producing PSA.
Seeds: Brachytherapy with permanent seeds is an outpatient procedure. Temporary, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy requires an overnight stay in the hospital. Men with preexisting urinary problems or glands over 60cc are more prone to develop urethritis from brachytherapy. A benign PSA rise after the implant, termed a “PSA Bump,” occurs in 30% of men and can engender considerable anxiety.
IMRT treatment requires two months to deliver. Radiation beaming through surrounding organs may increase the risk of bladder and rectal tumors, though the risk is clearly less than one percent. The biggest risk besides impotence is proctitis. In the future, the injection of hydrogel between the prostate and the rectal wall may eliminate this risk (Hydrogel is pending FDA approval).
Cyberknife and Proton Therapy: Cyberknife is like IMRT but treatment is over one to two weeks rather than two months. Proton therapy is also similar to IMRT except it fires heavier subatomic particles (proton vs. photon). Proctitis rates are reported to be slightly higher with either of these two modalities.
Combination Radiation with Seeds and IMRT: Men with High-Risk disease and even some with Intermediate-Risk are treated with a combination of Seeds and IMRT. The side effects of Seed/IMRT combinations are similar to those of seeds alone.
The Outdated Sequencing Argument
As stated at the outset, cure rates are high with both radiation and surgery. Arguments touting surgery as the “Gold Standard” were true ten years ago when suboptimal radiation resulted in lower cure rates. Regrettably, to this day, many surgeons are still claiming that sequencing surgery before radiation is advantageous. This outdated thinking prioritizes planning for relapse, forgetting about the need to focus on quality of life. The goal is to be cured with the first treatment and be spared the side effects of additional rounds of therapy.
Taking Time to Decide
Prostate cancer is slow moving condition. There is no need rush to a decision. Radiation or surgery cures men with Intermediate-Riskprostate cancer 70-90% of the time. Even if a relapse occurs, salvage therapy usually gives a normal life expectancy. Additional options, besides surgery and radiation, can also be considered for men in the Intermediate-Risk category including active surveillance, focal therapy and intermittent hormone blockade. However, these treatments are outside the medical mainstream and beyond the scope of this short blog.
Labels:
brachytherapy,
cialis,
climacturia,
impotence,
IMRT,
incontinence,
levitra,
procitis,
prostate cancer,
proton,
quality of life,
stricture,
urethritis,
viagra
Tuesday, July 24, 2012
Erection? Who said “Erection?”
BY RALPH BLUM
The three basic questions doctors hear when discussing treatment options are:
And the big one: Will I be able to get an erection?
However, the two modern radiation options—permanently implanted radioactive seeds (Brachytherapy) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)—are at least as effective as surgery at curing the disease. And more importantly, the precise targeting means less risk of “collateral damage.” In other words, Calvin has a better chance of keeping Betsy happy—especially with a little help from the wonders of modern pharmacology. Calvin and Viagra are now wedded at the hip!
Although most men, when they
are diagnosed with prostate cancer, are primarily concerned with staying alive,
there is a surprisingly large constituency who, as my psychiatrist friend put
it “vote with their dicks.” For these men, not being able to have an erection
is literally a fate more awful than death. But for almost all of us, the degree
to which sexual function returns—or fails to return—is a matter of serious
concern.
The three basic questions doctors hear when discussing treatment options are:
Will it
cure me?
Will I
have to wear diapers?And the big one: Will I be able to get an erection?
No doctor can answer any of these questions with an unequivocal “Yes.” The
reality is that there are no guarantees. It’s a tough call whether to go for a
cure, or for quality of life—which for many of us means being able to get an
erection.
“I gotta tell you, Betsy is so much younger than I am. She’s right at the peak
of her sexuality,” my friend Calvin pointed out. “My ability to perform still
matters a lot to her. And there are plenty of folks like us—the May and
September couples. Far as I’m concerned, quality of life isn’t an option. It’s
the name of the game."
Compared to other treatment options such as active surveillance or hormone
therapy, surgery and radiation have one clear advantage: closure. But surgery
is also the chief culprit when it comes to ruining your sex life. The nerve
bundles that control erections are located perilously close to the prostate
gland, so you’re cutting past a lot of delicate apparatus, and even with nerve-sparing surgery performed by an
experienced and talented surgeon, it’s very easy for things to go wrong. Once
those nerve bundles are cut, it’s goodbye to erections.
However, the two modern radiation options—permanently implanted radioactive seeds (Brachytherapy) and intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)—are at least as effective as surgery at curing the disease. And more importantly, the precise targeting means less risk of “collateral damage.” In other words, Calvin has a better chance of keeping Betsy happy—especially with a little help from the wonders of modern pharmacology. Calvin and Viagra are now wedded at the hip!
According to the TV commercials, part of the cure for erectile dysfunction
appears to be lounging with your sweetie in adjacent bathtubs while holding
hands and watching the sunset. Providing, of course, you have taken the pill
that does increase blood flow to your penis.
Bottom line: While the use of
Viagra and Cialis to prevent ED after treatment is still not totally proven,
and despite the fact that these pills can be very expensive, most of us guys,
when we find out that using them will probably contribute to sustaining our
long term sexual function and keeping the physical side of our relationships
sweet and nourishing, we feel that using these pills regularly is a must.
Like an insurance policy for intimacy.
Labels:
active surveillance,
brachytherapy,
cialis,
Erection,
hormone therapy,
IMRT,
levitra,
prostate cancer,
radiation,
surgery,
viagra
Tuesday, May 1, 2012
A Question of Blood Flow?
BY RALPH BLUM
Have you been watching the TV commercials for drugs that combat erectile dysfunction? I don’t know about you but I’ve been conditioned PR wise—only in the wrong direction. I mean, I’ve become like one of Pavlov’s dogs gone bonkers - every time the bell rings, instead of salivating, I tend to piss on the bell-ringer’s leg. It’s gotten to the point where I grab the mute button whenever I hear any one of the brand names, or see a shot of a couple lying in his-and-hers bathtubs on a cliff overlooking the Promised Land. “A question of blood flow,” my keester! Still, in case you’re still in the “Help me get it up” market, let’s review a few of the offerings.
In addition to Viagra, Cialis, and Levitra, I found 12 other erectile dysfunction drugs listed; drugs with names like Staxyn, Yohimbe, Erex and Testomar . . . Compared with the big three, the others received very few, if any, reviews. However, ED commercials are ubiquitous on the Internet. When I last looked, I found over 300 “male enhancement” products on the market, each of them promising “bigger and better erections.” But what if you’re just not interested? What if one’s desire for sex is totally absent?
We know certain things for sure about prostate cancer and one of them is that it is, to various degrees, testosterone driven. Unfortunately, so is sexual desire. So what controls the cancer—a radically diminished testosterone level in the blood, aka TIP, as Mark has christened, it is a part of the formula for staying alive.
Attending Support Groups over the past two decades, I’ve heard a lot of discussion about erections and the absence of same. I’d bet that 96% of the complaints concerning the ED resulting from hormone therapy (and the resulting suspension of intercourse) do not come from our partners. It’s a guy thing. As one woman summed it up at a Support Group at the PCRI Conference last year, “If it’s a choice, believe me, we would rather have you alive than have sex.” So we’re talking ego versus reality.
Yet all is not lost. Some couples, like my old Ojai friends, J and L, have replaced coitus with massage and cuddling and exploring touch, only to find that they actually have greater intimacy. As they have told one another, “I can’t see you too well, and I can’t hear you . . . But it feels really good.”
With all the horror stories, stories of fear and shame, of loss and self doubt, I find it heartening to see the lighter side. So when it comes to a catalogue of all the possible unpleasant side effects of erectile dysfunction drugs—ranging from dizziness and stuffy nose to seizure or sudden decrease or loss of hearing or vision—my favorite warning concerns priapism: “To avoid long term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than four hours.” By all means, call your doctor. In fact, you could make two calls, one toThe Guinness Book of Records!
In Chapter 16 of Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers, Mark talks about the effects of testosterone reduction and how to minimize its negative impact. While Viagra would permit most men to attain a workable erection, the problem proved to be more basic. When he was conducting a study, Mark found that many men simply “forgot” to take their Viagra. He wrote: “To complete the study I had to resort to phoning them at home to remind them to take their pill.” While helping to preserve their lives, TIP had actually sapped all their interest in sex.
I have ridden the edge for what is now approaching a quarter of a century. I have undergone no invasive treatment. Only hormone blockade. There are no guarantees. Things may change, making treatment advisable at some point in my future. But so far so good. For me my low libido has been a small price to pay to keep my show on the road.
Labels:
cialis,
erectile dysfunction,
levitra,
low libido,
prostate cancer,
support groups,
testosterone level,
TIP,
viagra
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)