BLOGGERS: MARK SCHOLZ, MD & RALPH H. BLUM
The co-authors of Invasion of the Prostate Snatchers, blog alternate posts weekly. We invite you to post your comments.
BY MARK SCHOLZ, MD
As a specialist in prostate cancer, I am in constant contact
with men who are exerting prodigious efforts to get appropriate treatment for
their disease. However, as many people are learning, low-risk forms of prostate
cancer rarely lead to death. Therefore,
I am concerned that many men are missing the big picture regarding their
overall health. They have a greater risk
of dying from other causes than from prostate cancer (Table 1). Many of these common diseases are preventable
by early detection.
The obvious place to start is with an annual physical with
standard blood tests. Testing should include evaluation of liver and kidney
function, mineral levels in the blood, evaluation of vitamin and hormone levels
and testing for anemia and serum glucose. The specific blood tests are
explained in more detail at http://prostateoncology.com/files/pdf/Standard_Laboratory_Tests.pdf
Heart Disease, the #1 Killer
The root cause of heart disease is cholesterol plaque, otherwise known as
“hardening of the arteries” or atherosclerosis. Cholesterol infiltrating the
arterial wall causes inflammation and scarring. Over time, scar tissue becomes
calcified. When plaque progresses to
arterial blockage, a heart attack occurs. Similarly, a stroke occurs if an
artery supplying blood to the brain is blocked.
Only Scans Can
Measure Plaque
Cholesterol blood tests answer the question, “How much
cholesterol is floating in the blood?" The real question that needs to be
answered is, “How much cholesterol is sticking to the wall of the artery?” Modern CT scans accurately measure coronary
plaque with a dose of radiation similar to a set of dental X-rays. Color Doppler
ultrasound measures plaque in the carotid arteries leading to the brain without
any radiation exposure at all.
What if Plaque
is Detected?
1. Obtain an exercise stress treadmill
2. Lower cholesterol and blood pressure
3. Inhibit blood coagulation with aspirin and fish oil
4. Follow a sensible diet and exercise regularly
Osteoporosis
With age, bones weaken from calcium loss. Osteoporosis is
mistakenly thought to occur only in women.
However, one-third of hip fractures occur in men of advanced age. Bone fractures have dire consequences
associated with shortened survival, chronic
pain and loss of height. Causes of osteoporosis include over-activity of
the thyroid or parathyroid glands, excessive alcohol, caffeine or tobacco.
Cortisone use, excess vitamin A, lack of exercise and vitamin D deficiency are
additional potential causes. Hormone therapy used to treat prostate cancer can
also cause osteoporosis.
Only Scans Can
Detect Osteoporosis
Osteoporosis needs to be identified and treated before a
fracture occurs. There are two types of scanning technology used to detect
osteoporosis, DEXA and QCT. While both
types of scan are accurate in women,
only QCT is accurate in men. In men,
DEXA seriously underestimates the
degree of osteoporosis.
Osteoporosis
Treatment Protocol
1. Calcium 500 mg with dinner or at bedtime
2. Vitamin D 1,000 units daily. Adjust
dosage according to measured blood levels
3. Weight bearing exercise
4. Consider prescription medication with Fosamax, Boniva or
Prolia
Colon Cancer
Colon cancer is easily curable when detected early.
Screening can be accomplished with colonoscopy (a scope performed by a
physician called a gastroenterologist), or with a CT scan, which is termed a virtual colonoscopy.
Beware of Sarcopenia
Muscle mass and strength automatically decline with age.
Studies in otherwise healthy individuals indicate that poor fitness is more
dangerous than smoking! Table 2 shows the dramatic difference in predicted
10-year survival of men age 65 depending
on their fitness level. Muscle loss can be prevented with regular exercise
consisting of weight training for an hour twice a week.
Lung Cancer
Smokers who forgo lung scans are
taking a huge risk. Lung cancer is almost universally
fatal if diagnosed after symptoms such as cough, chest pain, or weight loss
appear. CT scans can detect small lung cancers at an early stage when it can
still be surgically removed and cured.
Smokers (and any ex-smokers who quit in the last 10-15 years) are crazy
not to spring for $300 each year to have a lung scan done.
Flu and
Pneumonia
Flu is easily recognized by the sudden onset of fever, sore
throat and body aches. Most people know about vaccines but forget that Tamiflu,
an antibiotic, is effective if started within 24 hours of initial symptoms. The
risk of pneumonia can be reduced by Pneumovax given every ten years. It is
recommended for men who are over age 65 or who have a chronic illness.
Conclusion
The screening and early prevention program outlined in this
article relies more heavily on scans, vaccines and prescription pharmaceuticals
than many men would prefer. However, the serious health conditions listed above
have a propensity to incubate silently until the day they suddenly explode on
the scene as a full-blown disaster. The old aphorism, “An ounce of prevention
is better than a pound of cure” certainly applies when there is an opportunity
to detect and prevent life-threatening illness at the earliest possible
stage.
BY MARK SCHOLZ, MD
How can anyone call a cancer “Good?” As time goes by, it seems that prostate cancer is becoming more confusing, not less. Many of us have heard the statement that, “Men die with prostate cancer, not from it.” Or another commonly repeated statement, “The treatment is worse than the disease.”
But then we hear about Merv Griffin or Dennis Hopper, men with immense financial resources, dying from prostate cancer. How can we say that prostate cancer is “Good?”
When someone hears the word CANCER, they think they know what you are talking about. Cancer is so common that it now vies with heart disease for being the most common cause of death in men. Cancer has touched the lives of most people, usually in a very negative way.
Perhaps the best way to get a feel for prostate cancer is to compare the “Bad” type of prostate cancer with cancer of the lung or colon, the other two most common types of cancer in men. Other cancers of the brain, bone, stomach, pancreas, kidney and bladder tend to behave in a way that is similar to lung or colon cancer.
|
|
“Bad” Prostate Cancer
|
Blood test available for early detection
|
no
|
yes
|
Hormone therapy available
|
no
|
yes
|
Spreads to liver or brain
|
Yes
|
no
|
10-year survival rate
|
10-50%
|
90%
|
Average survival after relapse
|
1-2 years
|
More than10 years
|
Since the table tells us that it’s far better to have a “Bad” prostate cancer than just about any other type of cancer, imagine how confusing it is when people are told they have a “Good” type of prostate cancer. What the heck does that mean?
Men are encouraged to refrain from fearing Low-Risk or “Good” prostate cancer because their life expectancy is identical to or even better than that of men who have never been diagnosed with prostate cancer, even without treatment. Since the survival rate is excellent, immediate administration of toxic therapies that ruin sexual and urinary function is inappropriate and often reprehensible.
There is a question that frequently arises: “How accurately can doctors discriminate between the good and bad types of prostate cancer? Do they ever make mistakes and advise men with “Bad” prostate cancer to forgo immediate treatment?
Until fairly recently, men with “Bad” prostate cancer were misdiagnosed because standard prostate biopsy techniques do not routinely sample the front half of the prostate gland. While cancer in the front of the prostate is uncommon, and because the area is not routinely biopsied, high grade cancers could be missed. Fortunately, recently developed imaging with multi-parametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) can now detect high grade disease in the front or anterior half of the gland with a high degree of accuracy.
Imaging with MRI is so improved that preliminary studies presented in Atlanta at this year’s meeting of the American Urology Association indicate that multi-parametric MRI may be able to replace biopsy altogether. I am planning to review these exciting reports in my next blog.