In
2010, Provenge was approved by the FDA, the first approved prostate cancer
treatment that functions by enhancing the immune system. Over the last
couple of years Provenge has been gaining
popularity with oncologists and urologists as well as with patients. What has
been surprising to me is how slowly doctors and patients have warmed up to the
idea of using the immune system to fight prostate cancer. For years my
patients have been taking handfuls of Graviola, Shitaki mushrooms, Pau de Arco
and Esiac tea because of unsubstantiated claims of immune enhancement. Yet, when
the FDA approved an effective immune treatment that prolongs life I was
surprised that my patients needed to be convinced to use it.
Why, you might ask, is there any hesitation in the first
place? Well, Provenge is certainly different from other anticancer
therapies at least in one very distinctive way: Whereas the effectiveness
of most treatments is signaled by a drop in PSA, PSA levels usually don’t
decline after Provenge. Having supervised more than a hundred
Provenge-treated men, I have certainly seen exceptional cases with dramatic PSA
declines. However, this is not the general rule. Most of the time PSA continues
rising after Provenge. So people start wondering, if PSA is not dropping, how
can Provenge prolong survival? People forget that even though Provenge is
administered over a six-week period, once the immune system is activated, it
keeps functioning indefinitely; it’s the gift that keeps giving for the rest of
your life. Therefore, even if Provenge only slows disease growth
slightly, the inhibitory effect keeps accumulating over time. So over a period
of years, even a mild effect can become substantial.
If
the hypothesis that Provenge is inducing a mild, long-lasting anticancer effect
is correct, men take Provenge at an earlier stage (who have a longer projected
survival) should receive a bigger survival benefit than men treated at a later
stage. To test this thought, Dendreon, the manufacturer of Provenge, analyzed
data from the original studies that led to FDA approval. Please note: the researchers did not compare the survival
of men treated earlier versus the survival of men treated later.
Obviously, men treated at an earlier stage live longer. No, what they did
is compare survival of Provenge-treated men with earlier-stage disease with
similar-stage placebo-treated men. They did the same analysis
(Provenge-treated men versus placebo-treated men) in men with later-stage
prostate cancer and in men with disease “in between” early and late
stage. Early stage—low-intermediate stage, high-intermediate stage and
late stage—was defined by PSA levels of less than 22, 22-50, 50-134, and
greater than 134 respectively. The table below summarizes the results of their
analysis.
|
Patients
Grouped by Baseline PSA
|
|||
≤22
|
22– 50
|
50–134
|
>134
|
|
Number
patients
|
128
|
128
|
128
|
128
|
Survival
months:
|
|
|
|
|
Provenge
|
41.3
|
27.1
|
20.4
|
18.4
|
Placebo
|
28.3
|
20.1
|
15.0
|
15.6
|
Survival
Difference:
|
13.0
|
7.1
|
5.4
|
2.8
|
As
can be seen from the table, all groups that were treated with Provenge showed a
survival advantage compared to the same stage men treated with placebo.
However, when Provenge was given at an earlier stage, the survival advantages
became larger. Men with the earliest stage (PSA < 22) lived 13 months
longer than similar stage men who were placebo-treated. Men with advanced
stage only lived a couple months longer than advanced-stage placebo-treated
men.
This
pattern of improved survival with earlier stage disease seems to fit the
hypothesis that the inhibitory effect of Provenge results in a progressively
longer survival when its effects are allowed to
accumulate over a longer lifespan. Based on this data one would logically
conclude that Provenge induces the biggest benefits when administered at the
earliest possible stage. In the real world, where Provenge is only
covered by insurance for men who are hormone resistant and have metastases, men
on Lupron who have a rising PSA should be vigilantly monitored with scans such
as Prostascint, C11 acetate PET and Sodium Fluoride PET scans every 6 months to
detect metastatic disease at the earliest possible stage.
2 comments:
Interesting. But how is the Provenge Treatment different from eating foods and fruits that's rich in anti-oxidants, If it's also an immune system enhancer?
So why wait until the Cancer has metastasized and all other treatments have run lost their effectiveness. Why not use this while the cancer is small and contained and not so smart -- during Active Surveillance?
Post a Comment