If
you have read some of my previous blogs you probably will be aware that I am
not an advocate of radical prostatectomies in any shape, way or form. But since
the robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) is the flavor of the month
with both prostate cancer patients and their urologists, it seems pertinent to
zero in on some of the information you need to know if you are considering this
procedure.
There
is something alluring about the idea a surgeon sitting at an attached console
and manipulating a robot’s mechanical arms to perform this highly complex and
intricate operation. But if you are under the impression that it is the robot
making those small incisions in your abdomen to perform the operation, think again.
It is the skill of the surgeon that will preserve (or not) your sexual function
by avoiding damaging the miniscule nerves that run along each side of the
prostate and control erections. It is the surgeon’s experience that will
(or not) protect the sphincter that allows you to retain urinary control. And
it is the surgeon’s expertise that will ensure a positive, long-term outcome.
RALP
has advantages over other forms of radical prostatectomy in terms of pain,
blood loss, and recovery time. No small thing. But keep in mind that any
complex surgery comes with risks: the small risk of heart-attack, stroke, blood
clots in the legs that could travel to the lungs, reactions to anesthesia, and
infection of the incision sites. And because there are many blood vessels near
the prostate gland, there is also the risk of prolific bleeding, in which case
blood transfusions might be necessary—which carry their own risk. But your risk
level depends primarily on your overall health, your age, and the skill of your
surgical team.
Having
said that, I realize how tempting it is to go for closure. But is
surgery—robotic- assisted or otherwise--really closure? Statistics show that is
debatable. And in terms of the side-effects that most men are concerned
about (urinary incontinence and impotence) there is little difference
between robotic-assisted surgery and laparoscopic surgery performed without the
robot. Bottom line, the most important factor with either procedure is the
surgeon’s experience and skill.
Opinions
differ about how many robotic-assisted operations a surgeon needs to perform to
become really proficient, but surgeons at community hospitals rarely have
sufficient experience. And you do not want to be part of a surgeon’s
steep learning curve. Dr. Vipul Patel, of the Global Robotics Institute in
Celebration, Florida, appears to be leading the pack having performed some
8,000 robotic prostatectomies.
It’s
apparently hard to resist the lure of a robot. But any kind of radical
prostatectomy is both costly and risky, so don’t let your natural desire for
closure blind you to the risks of such a challenging surgery—especially if you
are 70 or over. In fact if you have low-risk prostate cancer and are over
65, you have a 20% chance of dying of cancer in the next 20 years compared to a
60% chance of dying of something else. So buyer beware!
No comments:
Post a Comment